BUY SIDE · HEALTHTECH DILIGENCE
AI due diligence for HealthTech acquisitions.
Prior authorization AI, clinical decision support, and PHI-routing tools create Annex III exposure most HealthTech buyers never discover before close.
SECTION 01
Why HealthTech is different.
Clinical decision support and prior authorization systems fall under EU AI Act Annex III §5(a). Conformity assessment is a hard requirement, not a recommendation.
Most HealthTech targets route PHI through one or more AI vendors. A BAA gap with any one of them is a HIPAA exposure that survives close.
Privacy policy v4.1 of an average HealthTech Series C lists 6 sub-processors. IRON reliably finds 2 to 4 additional AI vendors active in production but not disclosed there.
SECTION 02
What IRON finds in HealthTech deals.
-
OpenAI BAA gapsDetected via job postings; not listed in privacy policy sub-processors. EU AI Act Art. 28.
-
Annex III classificationClinical decision support meets the Annex III definition. Conformity assessment required.
-
PHI routingGitHub repos reference patient data preprocessing. Potential HIPAA §164.514 issue.
-
CMS coverage determination AIAutomated coverage determinations require human review pathway under CMS guidance.
SECTION 03
Frameworks that apply.
| Framework | Trigger | Obligation |
|---|---|---|
| EU AI Act | Art. 6, Annex III §5(a) | Conformity assessment, post-market monitoring, Art. 13 transparency |
| HIPAA | §164.502, §164.514 | Minimum-necessary use of PHI, de-identification, BAA chain |
| GDPR | Art. 22 | Right to human review of automated decisions affecting EU patients |
Questions about a HealthTech deal?
Book a 20-minute call →