BUY SIDE · FINTECH DILIGENCE
AI due diligence for FinTech acquisitions.
Credit scoring, underwriting, and fraud detection AI trigger ECOA adverse action obligations and EU AI Act Annex III classification. Most are undisclosed in data rooms.
SECTION 01
Why FinTech is different.
EU AI Act Annex III §5(b) classifies creditworthiness AI as high-risk. Conformity assessment, technical documentation, and post-market monitoring obligations attach.
Adverse action notices that do not reflect the model logic violate ECOA / Reg B. The CFPB has issued specific guidance on AI in lending.
Black-box credit models cannot meet ECOA explainability requirements. Most FinTech targets carry this exposure quietly.
SECTION 02
What IRON finds in FinTech deals.
-
ML credit scoring (ECOA)Detected via engineering postings. Disparate-impact analysis not publicly documented.
-
Annex III creditworthiness AITriggers mandatory conformity assessment under EU AI Act Article 43.
-
Model explainability gap (CFPB)Black-box model references conflict with CFPB AI-in-lending guidance.
-
BSA/AML model riskVendor model risk attestations stale or missing.
SECTION 03
Frameworks that apply.
| Framework | Trigger | Obligation |
|---|---|---|
| EU AI Act | Art. 6, Annex III §5(b) | Creditworthiness classification, conformity assessment |
| ECOA / Reg B | Adverse action notices | Model logic explainability for adverse decisions |
| CFPB Model Risk | AI in lending guidance | Documentation, monitoring, vendor management |
| Colorado AI Act | SB 24-205 | Consequential decision disclosures, impact assessment |
Questions about a FinTech deal?
Book a 20-minute call →